44
C-Span | Supreme Court Hears Case on TikTok Ban
(www.youtube.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
44 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22659 readers
174 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.
Take any slop posts to the slop trough
Main is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
@[email protected] @[email protected]@[email protected] yall are saying the justices are going to overturn this law, right? why the hell are CBS and the New YorKKK CrimeSS claiming the opposite???
I definitely think the justices were wrecking the US's arguments. I do not assume that the decision will reflect that. They are the state and will carry out the will of the state, whatever that will may be.
It is all a very careful legal dance to make sure that they banning TikTok for the right reason.
Also, I only started listening after the TikTok lawyer was done, so I missed anything they said to him.
the tiktok lawyer sucked in my opinion.
his rebuttal made me facepalm
he had nothing on the national security argument, for a variety of reasons, except the foreign registration act; which i think goes to show how America has handled (poorly, some would say) foreign influence. The fun fact about half the national security arguments being redacted is cringeworthy. And the data argument goes for just about every goddamn company that runs a website with ads, let alone a social platform.
ah i see