this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
-1 points (0.0% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29048 readers
4 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

and growing at a faster rate. Is this true? Seeing as how Lemmy can’t communicate with Kbin but Kbin can with Lemmy it seems like Kbin might be the better bet or am I missing something?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're getting bad information and largely irrelevant information.

Stats:
Lemmy

Kbin

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've seen the graphs in that post, and it's pretty clear from how precisely kbin's graph tracks Lemmy's that what's going on here is some endpoint is being queried that counts federated Lemmy users as part of the kbin network. The numbers linked in the thread parent you replied to are the better ones.

I don't think anyone is trying to pull a fast one here. One of the big challenges of federation is keeping how different apps represent similar data in sync. I think kbin just has some user-count endpoint that quite reasonably counts federated Lemmy users as part of the kbin network (which they are). People are misinterpreting that data though as representing native kbin accounts, which is an incorrect interpretation (and probably incorrect presentation from the stats site... but almost certainly a well meaning error.