How do we understand the primary contradiction in settler states? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

71 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was recently in a conversation with a self-described MagaCommunist who held the position that the primary contradiction in the USA was that the financial owning class owned all of the means of production and that the contradictions of settler colonialism were secondary and could only be resolved through a workers' state.

I realized that I hold the position that settler colonialism is the primary contradiction in the USA, but I also found that I struggled to articulate it effectively. I'm looking for your own thoughts or writings that I can study to learn more on this topic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

My point was that if you organized labor, and then seized the state, if you didn't smash the ready-made apparatus of the state, then you would have a labor aristocratic party holding the reins of an imperialist power and without smashing them, they would maintain the contradictions of imperialism.

this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024

46 points (94.2% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

984 readers

24 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]