1080
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
1080 points (99.4% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
6859 readers
1382 users here now
Rules:
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
- Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
- If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
- Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
- Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
- This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The free speech Musk believes in is his ironclad right to speak. To him, contradiction is not speech, and he seems baffled whenever it happens, like he's just been slapped with a fish.
Musk isn’t confused at all. He’s been lying about believing in free speech this whole time. He’s an oligarch—literally the richest person in the world—who bought 𝕏itter in order to control speech.
Just to be clear, I'm not trying to say that Musk is confused about what free speech is -- I'm saying he's confused when he hears ideas that conflict with his worldview. He cannot process the idea that contradiction of his beliefs should even be possible and that drives him wild with rage.
I think it's important to understand that Musk doesn't think of most other human beings as "people" and he does not consider what they say as "speech". His worldview is entirely solipsistic and the only speech that exists is the speech he produces and the reflections of it that come back to him. To Musk, everything else is the braying of animals with diseased minds.
This take is so very, very specific 😅 Are you a psychologist or similar?
It's not that specific. It fits a lot of Social Darwinists that were born into money. Most just have the good sense to keep their voices down in public.
The solipsism and all this kind of stuff is very specific to me. Just because it "fits" doesn't mean it's actually the case though. Do you personally know people like this, that also keep their voices down? Like, are there any examples to share?
It's a pretty common belief in elite circles. For example the Trilateral commission describes itself as an organisation focused on "our roots as a group of countries sharing common values and a commitment to the rule of law, open economies and societies, and democratic principles" yet it was specifically set up to stem "excess democracy" in Europe and the US.
They don't see it as hypocritical. Democracy for them and democracy for you are two different things.
I couldn't find anything on solipsism on that page and I read quite far and did a search in the article.
How do we know that solipsism is a common belief among the elite? The belief that the world outside of one's own mind cannot be known, that it can't be known whether it's real or actually rather a product of one's own mind? To me this seems like a very specific philosophical view that people might consider sometimes, but not really hold themselves to. You'd think people would stop caring what happens to them if they believed this to be the case. But you're claiming with such confidence that this is a matter of fact in elite circles. How are you so sure?
He was forced to buy twitter. He did not want it.
That’s what the media told us, anyway. Maybe it’s somewhat true, but oligarchs buy the media all the time, not because they’re especially profitable but because they’re especially influential. The slippery slope of the oligarchy media model
I wish Twitter would have just left well enough alone.