this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
64 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10168 readers
17 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I stand corrected. Would appear they were careful in using the term justice instead of judge for that very reason. I do weber what would happen if he were disbarred... would the other justices pressure him to resign, since the disbarment apparently wouldn't affect his status as a justice...
It's not even generally true for appointed federal judges. There are no formal job requirements to become a federal judge.
That's actually really depressing. We've created a political role based on legal definition that bypasses all of the normal expectations. Not that I'm overly surprised, everything to do with politics is truly all about obtaining and maintaining power however possible.
The issue is that you would have a small group of industry insiders telling everyone else to can and can't be a judge. It would also be easier to target people and prevent them from becoming a judge by getting them disbarred through a non-government process.