World News

22023 readers

49 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

James Cameron reacts sub implosion: 'I'm struck by the similarity of the Titanic disaster itself' (www.youtube.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Film director James Cameron has expertise in designing and testing these submersibles, and he has many criticisms of the design of the sub that imploded, and of the hubris of the CEO who ignored repeated safety warnings from the diving community. He also mentions that the sub seems to have been attempting to resurface when it imploded, suggesting that they were aware the hull was starting to fail.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Cameron did it in a sub that was tested and certified. The Titan sub was not actually tested or certified, because that would have been expensive.

Hell, Titan's view port was only rated for 1300 meters, not the 4000 meters of the Titanic wreck.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hey - it's only 1.7 miles short, it just sounds bad when you put it in meters

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That's justification for a negligence claim. Staying that your sub meets or exceeds a standard and knowing the view port wasn't certified to those depths is the very definition of negligence. And then knowing the vessel was only a single use and using multiple times seems like a really good claim on manslaughter. Rush is lucky he's dead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

oof, guess it shouldn't be surprising that they went missing...