this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
85 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8242 readers
214 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A couple accounts ago on , I was arguing with a lib and called their beliefs "inane".
They proceeded to correct me with "*insane, and they're not".
This is an American with English as their first and only language, I'm Chinese and English is my second language. Libs with vibes based politics absolutely get psychic healing from feeling "correct" even when they're objectively incorrect. They need to get one over whomever they're arguing with so they can feel superior. This leads to debate bro brain worms.
On another forum years ago with a news and debate subforum, I was arguing with chuds about I forget what. I do remember, though, using the term "proto-feminism" when describing Mary Wollstonecraft and arguments she was making before the First Wave Suffragettes. Some chud started arguing about Mary Shelly and Frankenstein weren't "pro-feminist". Not only getting the wrong Mary, but he also confused himself with an argument nobody made and went on some tirade about it.
I came back a few hours after I posted and said "Your rage essay is tl;dr and you worked yourself up over something because you have poor reading comprehension." I think he even had Wikipedia links, which was even more funny because they were to the wrong things.
There's a great pair of scenes in Django Unchained that summarize those types of redditors. In the first scene the slaver Calvin Candie bullies and ridicules one of his slaves for not knowing the word "reimburse." Because he's a cruel dickhead.
Later on when Dr. Schultz (who admits English is not his first language!) drops the word "panache" in conversation Candie can't define it, making Candie look like a bozo.
Smug reddit types are the bad guys in a Tarantino movie.
It's even funnier because Candie likes to boast that he's a huge francophile, but when asked about a French word he's caught up in his lies. Same with reddit guys who love to feel smarter than everyone else but fail to show basic intelligence.
“Don’t speak French you’ll embarrass him”