this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
497 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2233 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) lost her bid to lead Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, defeated 131-84 by Rep. Gerry Connolly in a secret caucus vote.

Reports suggest former Speaker Nancy Pelosi actively lobbied against AOC, backing Connolly by making calls and using political capital to sway votes.

Connolly, 74, cited his experience and record as decisive factors in his victory, despite progressive disappointment over AOC’s loss.

Supporters viewed AOC’s bid as a chance to revitalize Democratic strategy, calling the outcome a missed opportunity for the party.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 172 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It's great to see the Democrats have learned absolutely nothing and continue to refuse to evolve.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Why would they? American 2 party system just means they have infinite job security, funding and no reason to adapt. So you can either choose flawed Democrats or literal idiots. What will you do?

I genuinely confused how people expect things to be different here. I'm not an American so maybe I'm missing something, but this genuinely seems a system design flaw rather than anything else.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh there are many of us across the political spectrum that are aware of how our two party system fails us. For the record, I don't expect things to be different but in light of how bad things are it's hard not to get my hopes up especially when there's a good chance at meaningful change.

Many of us are becoming further and further disillusioned with our political system. However, things are changing slowly. Municipalities are introducing ranked choice voting systems and there are efforts to expand that to the state level. Maybe someday we'll put this mess behind us.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago

A bunch of (5 states) ranked choice voting ballot measures were just rejected directly by citizens, and another went so far as to ban it, and many red states have already done that. Team money won by convincing the public to vote against their own interests. Sorry to bear bad news, maybe there's something else to be hopeful about still but I'm not seeing it. The only good news I've heard in American politics since the election was within the last few weeks, and it gets you banned on most of the Internet for saying so.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago

They learned alright. They learned that they don't need to win elections to rake in billions in donations. They just have to put in a half-hearted effort and the cash will roll in. They really do not care if they win or lose. They also don't care what happens to us when fascists take over as long as there there's enough zeroes in the DNC checking accounts.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think they’re ignorant, they’d just rather support the fascists than the progressives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's not their fault they keep loosing, it's the voters who are too dumb to understand that Democrats are marginally better than fascists. /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why would they learn anything? The entire .world instance, Dem Reddit/Twitter, etc. does nothing but run defense for them, tell everyone they need to vote for them no matter what, and browbeat everyone who engages in criticism of the party during every election season, local and national.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's your duty to vote to stop fascism (again). I'm so tired of that message. They can earn my vote, I've tried stopping fascism twice now, what have they done besides maintain the status quo

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

OK, but the alternative is allowing fascism, which is worse than voting for the status quo.

We just needed to hold on until the boomers died.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Turns out constantly voting for the status quo when it is shit got us to fascism anyway!

Boomers disappearing won't fix this, they've already indoctrinated members of Gen Z. The problem wasn't that being born at a specific time made you a conservative, it's that conservatism requires a lot of idiots to support it. They've bred their fresh crop of idiots, and they won't stop digging their hooks in until we unfuck private media ownership and enforce education standards.