this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
38 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8242 readers
252 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I saw Waterworld for the first time like 5 years ago and thought it was fun.
The Dark Tower I thought was good, but I haven't read the books. As someone not familiar with the series, I didn't mind it, though I would have liked it more as a TV show. Mathew McConaughey is a great villain.
I'm a sucker for Michael Bay movies. I think he doesn't get enough credit for trying to make good movies for as wide an audience as possible. Making something for a niche fandom is a lot easier because you know exactly what they're into. But making something that appeals to 8-year-olds, 20-somethings on a date, retirees looking to kill an afternoon, and for multiple countries in multiple languages? That's a very difficult challenge.
A lot of sequels are good if you just ignore they're sequels and treat them as their own thing. Blair Witch 2 fits into this category. City Slickers 2 isn't as much of a drama as the first, but it's a fantastic comedy.
Speaking of sequels, Jurassic Park 2 and 3 I've always enjoyed. The second one is a bit of a low point, not bringing back a lot of the characters of the first. But how they setup the third with Grant getting conned was a really clever setup. They could have easily made In-Gen the villain again as low hanging fruit.
The Star Wars sequel trilogy is better than the prequels. Both trilogies are nonsensically dumb stories, but the sequels have better acting and practical effects. Large portions of the prequels are boring filler trying to hamfist references from the original trilogy. Solo and Rogue One were where the real Disney Star Wars talent ultimately went, however.
Revenge of The Sith bodies sequels 1v1 but as a box set it's tough
also yeah plus 1 for Michael Bay he kicks ass and he is totally self aware that he makes ridiculous stuff. Watch 'Pain and Gain' - he makes a parody film of his OWN style.
As someone who was a big fan of the books.
I see. I liked honestly the entire first trilogy of the JP movies. Jurassic World was kinda meh and I didn't finish It's sequel because I got bored of It. I feel like It should have been a standalone reboot movie tbh.
I do agree with Rouge One and Solo, I loved those tbh. Andor is pretty good too. I only liked the first Star Wars sequel movie tbh, The Last Jedi bored me tbh. The prequels are just entertainingly bad. I feel If instead of Lucas directing It and someone else did they would have turned out great.
Also unrelated to the movies but I got a Lego buildable figure of Jyn from Rouge One that I got as a kid lol.