Prince Pyotr Alexeyevich Kropotkin was born in 1842 and breathed his last in 1921. Kropotkin was a Russian noble. He was educated for army and at the age of twenty he became a military officer in Siberia.
Kropotkin’s great interest in science developed from his military training which he received to get a job. This moulded his life in future. He had a scientific mind and devoted his time and energy to the study of books on science.
As a military officer in Siberia Kropotkin got ample opportunity for geographical survey and expedition. Thus his shift from military service to geographical survey and expeditions enriched the subject profoundly. He contributed many articles to different journals.
Peter Kropotkin was a man of different mentality and attitude. His stay in military service could not satisfy his academic and intellectual requirements and desires and after serving several years he relinquished the job, and entered the University of St. Petersburg in 1867. His vast knowledge in geography brought for him the post of secretary of Geographical Society.
Even this vital administrative post could not detain him for long time. He moved to radical political movements. In 1872, Peter Kropotkin joined the International Workingmen’s Association. Later on he was deeply involved in subversive and anarchical activities. This led him to imprisonment in 1874.
He escaped from prison in 1876 and went to England. The England of the second half of eighteenth century was the centre of revolutionary activities, although she never experienced any revolution.
He also travelled to Switzerland and Paris. While in Paris he was again arrested by the French government in 1883. Released from prison in 1886 he went to England and settled there. While in exile, Kropotkin gave lectures and published widely on anarchism and geography. He returned to Russia after the Russian Revolution in 1917 but was disappointed by the Bolshevik state. The rest of his life was spent without political activity.
Peter Kropotkin was an evolutionist anarchist. But his evolutionism was more scientific than that of his predecessors. He wrote several books on anarchism such as ‘The Place of Anarchy in Socialist Evolution (1886), The Conquest of Bread (1888), Its Philosophy and Ideal (1896)’, ‘The State – Its Part in History (1898)’ and ‘Modern Science and Anarchism (1903)’. His deep interest in science, particularly biology and anthropology, opened before him new and enchanting vistas of knowledge and all these inspired him to study biological science with added interest.
-
The Funeral of Peter Kropotkin :anarchists:
-
A meeting between V.I. Lenin and P. A. Kropotkin :lenin-shining: :kropotkin-shining:
-
Words of a Rebel :anarchy:
-
Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution :AC-AnarKitty:
-
Syndicalism and Anarchism :ancom:
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread
- ✨ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread
- 👊 Share your gains and goals with your comrades in the New Weekly Improvement thread
- 🧡 Disabled comm megathread
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
I'm not a complicated man. Witcher IV good.
however
I'm mildly disappointed to see that Ciri will be the protag and continuing her path of Witchering. Mostly because my favorite ending to The Witcher III is Ciri accepting her role as Empress. I like this enging for several reasons, some sounder than others, mostly based in pedantic lore nonsense. One, it's fairly well established that Witchering is a miserable way to spend your life, even if you happen to have a few dear companions like Geralt does. Two, there are less and less monsters in the world all the time. Half the reason there are so few Witchers during the decades in which the books/games is because they didn't need to bother rebuilding the Witcher Order after it was mostly destroyed sixty years before the first book because there are so few monsters. It's established, I can't remember if it's book canon or game canon or both, that women can't undergo the mutations that create witchers superhuman reflexes and resistance to toxins because they were designed by callous mages with only boys in mind (and it kills most of them anyway). CDPR will have to have some answer as to why Ciri is drinking Witcher brews and moving supernaturally. Also it renders the subject infertile, so if Ciri's feudal claims are going to be brought up in any way that'll be important. Not implausible questions to answer, lore wise.Now given that the games establish distinct Witcher schools I imagined we might play as some other Witcher, maybe in some far flung corner of that world. Because I think, assuming this game is going to be about Ciri as a Witcher, they've missed a more interesting story. I'd much rather play a game focused around political intrigue as Empress Ciri. Which I think fits with the books because it seemed to me that Sapkowski got bored with his own premise around book three and wanted to write a sweeping political epic instead, falling back on his strengths as a short story writer to do so. And then every once in awhile we'd get a chapter of Geralt or Ciri doing something less interesting than whatever political aside we just went on. Granted, people would probably be upset if a game called Witcher IV didn't have any monster hunting in it (even though there's very little monster hunting in Geralt's books, which I've always thought was funny) but it'd be easy to do a dual protagonist situation. Ciri for the big political intrigue, and some lone Witcher who sees the repercussions of actions taken during the intrigue out in the real world.
I'd rather they left the franchise alone, Witcher III is a great game and a great capstone on the entire Witcher Saga if you take the books and the games as a whole. Making Witcher IV and making it be about Ciri as a witcher just feels like they can only end up making The Witcher III again but worse, because you can't ever go back and recapture what was. Not counting the mobile games and digital card/boardgames I've played every game that CDPR has put out and I've liked every one of them, so I'm tentatively hopeful that the Witcher 1 remake and this Witcher IV game will be better than I'm imagining.
Also the cinematic trailer for IV is just the Witcher III "Killing Monsters" trailer but longer and starring Ciri.
All of the games at TGA felt like complete pastiches, no idea what you could possibly get excited about there. Like sure, two decades ago when Hideki Kamiya started a new company you got like three or four brand new beloved games and totally new IPs and now all you get is a sequel to a decade old game (that already had a sequel)
I don't know what you mean about not being excited for the new games, I'm waiting with bated breath for the sure to disappoint Witcher sequel and The Last of Us Part 2 again this time for PC and the fucking The Outer Worlds 2 the sequel to The Outer Worlds. What an incredible panoply for Gamers to choose from. Now if only Bethesda would announce another version of Skyrim, maybe this time playable only as in-flight entertainment.
Noo you must enjoy slop metal gear survive elden ring version will be peak!!!!!
You forgot the sequels to decade old dead franchises, that's what one can really get excited about