this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
49 points (98.0% liked)

Privacy

1322 readers
2 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Does that mean that other apps like signal for example have back doors?

Do criminals have a knowledge of exploits in the recommended messaging apps?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Theoretically signal only has your phone number and time of sign up which means theoretically it shouldn't matter if the legal system asks them for information.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

... theoretically. In practice if the NSA used a secret court order that banned them from talking about it and made them update the app to reveal plaintext for one particular person, I don't see how they could get out of that (other than by breaking the law and risking jail).

I think the chances of that are very small though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

There is legislation in Australia that allows precicely this. Then 5 eyes or Interpol or whatever for everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

...that's a terrifying but also plausible prospect. Guess it's a reason not to use the published app and instead build it yourself.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yea and if a nation-state knows your phone number, they can track your exact whereabouts in real-time. Let's not pretend like we know better than them about what information matters :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

...yeah and if they went to signal to ask about you they're going to provide signal your phone number as it's the only identifier they have in their system...so the nation state already had that to begin with, it isn't sensitive info despite what it can be used for.