this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
234 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2462 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

To be fair, I doubt he'd pardon hunter if Kalama won. Can you imagine what would happen to Hunter with DoJ under trump admin? Yes he did crimes, but crimes need to have proportional punishment, which I doubt trump admin is gonna be fair about it.

Feeding your son to a felon president is a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair, I doubt he’d pardon hunter if Kalama won.

Why?

He said he wouldn't even if Trump won...

He was going to do it regardless.

Feeding your son to a felon president is a bad idea.

What about everyone gun owner who uses cannabis in a state that legalized cannabis?

Unfortunately crack and weed use would be treated the same under federal law.

Biden can fix that be de-classifying marijuana and help millions of Americans.

But he's only saving one crackhead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's really sad to me that the Portland community is moderated by a center right liberal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Portland in general needs a large dose of common sense if we want to have a livable city.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, cause there is anyone left wing on the city council and like we haven't had a succession of center right Democrats that used to be republicans as mayors.

The city is the way it is under leadership that aligns with your politics.

The city we have is the city we get if you get everything you want politically. It's literally your mess.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Hunter Biden was scheduled to be sentenced on Dec. 12 for his conviction on federal gun charges. He also was set to be sentenced on Dec. 16 in a separate criminal case in which he pleaded guilty to federal tax evasion charges in September.

Trump's absolutely screwed up Justice department would have had nothing to do with the sentencing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you know, unlike a Jury's "non-guilty" verdict, court sentencing can be appealed?

If the prosecution believes the sentence to be too light, they can appeal and request a heavier sentence.

Also, there are many more ways a weaponized DoJ can mess with its prisoners. if epstein got killed under trump admin, who's to say it can't happen to others, regardless of if they are as terrible as epstein or not.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Oh for fucks sake, you think that Epstein was killed by the Trump admin? Get out of here with that conspiracy theory BS.

And no a prosecutor can't just say "oh it's to light" and a judge just grants it. There had to be legal basis behind it like sentencing below the minimum mandated sentence and even the most shitty judges aren't looking to undermine the other judges and the system unlike what is happening here.

But whatever, you can all be go sports team with this and downvote away but you're just proving what regular Americans think, even if it's not, that both sides are the same with this.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

This wasn't because of the merits of the case or the interests of justice. This was a national security move. A Russian agent is taking over the DOJ. We're not going to give him the former president's son.

Lol.