159
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

From chapter 3 of The Will to Change (join the book club!) while she's discussing how mass media reinforces partriarchal norms onto boys and young men

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

The "occasional wizard of color" bit is funny because to be honest, I don't think you could fill both sides of single page of 8x11 printer paper with the text/character-to-character interactions between Harry Potter and Dean Thomas - the only black Gryffindor in his year - between books 1-6 until Harry decides Ginny is his OTP after dumping Cho Chang for no reason - and even then he barely interacts with Dean.

It's actually crazy that Kingsley Shacklebolt (disgost even I, as a young Harry Potter fan who was at each Barnes & Noble midnight release for books 4-7, knew that fucking name was racist I can't believe she fucking got away with it - Cho Chang is a similar vein ofc but damn I guess Cho should count her blessings that she wasn't named like Cho Nanking or something...) doesn't really appear as a speaking character until Book 5 but probably has more of a presence in the story than any of the 3 black Gryffindor wizards (and uh...the one black Slytherin Malfoy picked up in book 6....Blaze Zabini or whoever) and even then, his like most notable conversation with Harry is when they're doing the dumbass polyjuice potion assisted broom suicide for Hedwig in book 7.

JK Rowling they should bury you alive in the Edinburgh catacombs behind hardcover copies of all of Susan Stryker's books!!!

[-] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

Cho Chang

the funniest thing about the names from two cultures thing is that rowling could just say she's intentionally multiethnic but she doesn't care and she's not clever enough to come up with that.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

geordi-no Cho Chang

geordi-yes Kim Kitsuragi

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
159 points (98.2% liked)

menby

8048 readers
1 users here now

A space for masculine folks to talk about living under patriarchy.

Detoxing masculinity since 1990!

You don’t get points for feminism, feminism is expected.

Guidelines:

  1. Questions over blame
  2. Humility over pride
  3. Wisdom over dogma
  4. Actions over image

Rules (expansions on the guidelines):

  1. Mistakes should be learning experiences when possible.
    • Do not attack comrades displaying vulnerability for what they acknowledge are mistakes.
    • If you see good-faith behavior that's toxic, do your best to explain why it's toxic.
    • If you don't have the energy to engage, report and move on.
    • This includes past mistakes. If you've overcome extreme reactionary behavior, we'd love to know how.
    • A widened range of acceptable discussion means a greater need for sensitivity and patience for your comrades.
    • Examples:
      • "This is reactionary. Here's why."
      • "I know that {reality}, but I feel like {toxicity}"
      • "I don't understand why this is reactionary, but it feels like it {spoilered details}"
  2. You are not entitled to the emotional labor of others.
    • Constantly info-dumping and letting us sort through your psyche is not healthy for any of us.
    • If you feel a criticism of you is unfair, do not lash out.
    • If you can't engage self-critically, delete your post.
    • If you don't know how to phrase why it's unfair, say so.
  3. No singular masculine ideal.
    • This includes promoting gender-neutral traits like "courage" or "integrity" as "manly".
    • Suggestions for an individual to replace a toxic ideal is fine.
    • Don't reinforce the idea the fulfillment requires masculinity.
    • This also includes tendency struggle-sessions.
  4. No lifestyle content.
    • Post the picture of your new grill in !food (feminine people like grills too smh my head).
    • Post the picture of the fish you caught in !sports (feminine people like fish too smdh my damn head).
    • At best, stuff like this is off-topic. At worst, it's reinforcing genders norms..
    • If you're not trying to be seen as masculine for your lifestyle content, it's irrelevant to this comm. If you are trying to be seen as masculine, let's have a discussion about why these things are seen as masculine.

Resources:

*The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love by Bell Hooks

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS