159
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

From chapter 3 of The Will to Change (join the book club!) while she's discussing how mass media reinforces partriarchal norms onto boys and young men

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I’d say the Bartimaues Trilogy is a decent replacement to the latter Harry Potter books (3-7) if I recall correctly. The first 2 Harry Potter books are for a younger audience and are more childlike.

Nathaniel, one of the 3 POV characters of the series, is a chauvinistic asshole, but it is shown as such and the book frames him negatively as he develops these traits and goes down the dark path of becoming a government sorcerer fascist. He then redeems himself by abandoning all that baggage and conditioning and aiding the revolutionaries.

The other 2 POV characters are a revolutionary woman who is basically a straight up anti-mage communard, and a witty and sarcastic demonic entity that is actually just a tortured spirit that wants release. I seem to recall themes of equality and fighting oppression and unlearning prejudices and it was generally pretty judgmental of the oppressive world that sorcerers made and their wars, their entire system of magic is made out of summoning and enslaving spirits and they are tyrannical against non-magical ubermensch, and this entire thing is overthrown.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I’d say the Bartimaues Trilogy is a decent replacement to the latter Harry Potter books (3-7) if I recall correctly.

Hell yeah I never thought I'd see the Bartimaeus books being mentioned on Hexbear. Loved those books growing up and you're right, they were immediately one of the series I bounced to in between like Half-Blood Prince & Deathly Hallows. That trilogy, basically Garth Nix's entire bibliography at the time (what I would give to read Sabriel and Abhorsen again for the first time...s/o to Keys to the Kingdom too I remember those being decent), stuff like Kate Constable's Singer of All Songs series, and Tamora Pierce's Song of the Lioness & Circle of Magic series; all 58 of the Animorph books - shoutout The Solution and the other 2-3 David books; I would've trapped him as a rat too - based Rachel I will always remember the part where she went "yeah I'll stay with him to make sure he gets stuck in the rat morph, his tears won't affect me" and then she fuckin used that bald eagle morph to fly his rat ass to the desert and leave him there.

GOOD YOUNG ADULT FANTASY BOOKS - MY CHILDHOOD!!!! Shoutout to Firegold by Dia Calhoun too because that fucking book and the golden apple that plays a role in it have been stuck in my head since like 2005 because I was sitting in the library like 70 pages into it and going "oh...wait...this is a horse novel? i thought it was gonna be about wizards or something" trauma

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I read those books so many times as a kid, absolutely loved them.

there's also a cool fourth book set way thousands of years before the events of the trilogy when Bartimaeus was serving Solomon the Great btw

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
159 points (98.2% liked)

menby

8048 readers
1 users here now

A space for masculine folks to talk about living under patriarchy.

Detoxing masculinity since 1990!

You don’t get points for feminism, feminism is expected.

Guidelines:

  1. Questions over blame
  2. Humility over pride
  3. Wisdom over dogma
  4. Actions over image

Rules (expansions on the guidelines):

  1. Mistakes should be learning experiences when possible.
    • Do not attack comrades displaying vulnerability for what they acknowledge are mistakes.
    • If you see good-faith behavior that's toxic, do your best to explain why it's toxic.
    • If you don't have the energy to engage, report and move on.
    • This includes past mistakes. If you've overcome extreme reactionary behavior, we'd love to know how.
    • A widened range of acceptable discussion means a greater need for sensitivity and patience for your comrades.
    • Examples:
      • "This is reactionary. Here's why."
      • "I know that {reality}, but I feel like {toxicity}"
      • "I don't understand why this is reactionary, but it feels like it {spoilered details}"
  2. You are not entitled to the emotional labor of others.
    • Constantly info-dumping and letting us sort through your psyche is not healthy for any of us.
    • If you feel a criticism of you is unfair, do not lash out.
    • If you can't engage self-critically, delete your post.
    • If you don't know how to phrase why it's unfair, say so.
  3. No singular masculine ideal.
    • This includes promoting gender-neutral traits like "courage" or "integrity" as "manly".
    • Suggestions for an individual to replace a toxic ideal is fine.
    • Don't reinforce the idea the fulfillment requires masculinity.
    • This also includes tendency struggle-sessions.
  4. No lifestyle content.
    • Post the picture of your new grill in !food (feminine people like grills too smh my head).
    • Post the picture of the fish you caught in !sports (feminine people like fish too smdh my damn head).
    • At best, stuff like this is off-topic. At worst, it's reinforcing genders norms..
    • If you're not trying to be seen as masculine for your lifestyle content, it's irrelevant to this comm. If you are trying to be seen as masculine, let's have a discussion about why these things are seen as masculine.

Resources:

*The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love by Bell Hooks

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS