this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
811 points (99.6% liked)
196
17057 readers
706 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts require verification from the mods first
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What's wrong with a paper filter for a pour over?
It filters out the microscopic pasta chunks that you get to chew on if you brew it directly in the cup
mmm delicious 😋
Pretty wasteful, better use a French press
Or espresso
It's just the type of paper filter that was used. The person in the post used a flat-bottom filter when a No°3 or No°4 cone filter would've been better. (As an extra aside, the specific type of pour over device seems to be from Starbucks, and those come with No°3 cone filters to begin with.)
That could be a malita filter, which has a flat bottom.