this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
137 points (97.2% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

3342 readers
1116 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 53 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Right!? I've been so confused by the notion of Trump being the anti-Israel vote. That's not what I heard him say.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

I had someone arguing at me here, with the supreme confidence of the ignorant, that trump and Harris would be the same for Palestineans.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

I thought those accounts went dormant after the election. Maybe there's still some OpenAI credit left on the controller?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

One of those dumb fucks already responded here.

But Id like to think they're AI instead of just mind numbingly stupid.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 hours ago

They are trying to foment division among trump's opposition, the disinfo machines never stop until there is a civil war or collapse.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The Harris/Biden comparison was more valid, although we can't be sure she would stay that path once in office and with pressure from Congress and public. But at least there was a chance of both of those. Anyone who thought Trump wouldn't ramp things up or would listen to calls for change...I don't know what they were thinking. He's never done that, never been like that. His history as a businessman and as a President for four years is right there to review.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

The thing is that Harris could be moved by progressives winning primaries and the 2026 midterms at the very least. There is almost no hope of something similar for trump.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I mean yeah he would be/is, at least until Israel's genocide is over. There is literally nothing Trump can do (at least while beholden to the public and Congress) in this war that Biden hasn't already done.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's the silliest damn thing.

Why do you think Israel announced they were annexing the West Bank right after the election?

Ignorant goddamn children spouting off about global politics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

So first, I can't actually find anything about this except Smotrich pushing for annexation so do you have a source that says they're going to go forward with annexation? Now second, Smotrich started yapping about annexing West Bank settlements (not the whole West Bank; if Israel did that they'd have to give Palestinians rights) literally a day or two after the election, meaning he already had plans for something similar before then. You don't just wake up and start taking steps towards annexing an occupied territory that's not how that works.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is beholden to the public?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I mean he is to an extent. Everyone is talking like the fascist project in America is finished, but it's not and there's no guarantee they'll be able to complete it. That said it's mostly Congress doing the heavy lifting here; there are enough sane Republicans that Trump wouldn't be able to get away with some of the more outrageous stuff.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I would love to see the list of Republicans in Congress whose districts/states WEREN'T carried by pro-Trump zealots and who WOULDN'T lose their seats if they went against Trump.

Hint: it could fit on an index card, double spaced

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

That's such a waste of card stock. Use a sticky note.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

I mean there were Republicans opposed to one of his appointments (don't remember who) and you only need four of them to side with the Democrats to get a majority.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

I hope you're right but I won't hold my breath