this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23303 readers
17 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rust lobbyists winning

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I interpreted your comment as being dismissive of understanding basic memory safety because no jobs care about this.

I thought it ridiculous that people don't care that their programs explode. I guess it changes your mindset when your service going down isn't a matter of costing the company money, but affecting real people.

But maybe you weren't being sarcastic?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was being serious. I offhandedly expressed some excitement, in a comment I forgot I even wrote, about interviewing at a place that writes modern c++. Which, if you don't know, c++11 and especially beyond has features to manage lifetimes, ownership, memory, and other important things just as Rust does (but it's still C++, so of course it has all the baggage C++ must carry and a compiler that doesn't enforce any of this).

But you rushed at the opportunity to be a complete ass about it and insult me for no reason. Presumably you also dismissively assumed I've never written Rust. Or that in 2024 the Rust jobs are so overflowing that I can just take my pick at one at my own leisure. As if my first preference is to write software in a language that still requires forward declarations.

Yeah. You had such a good point, though. I really would rather not have an income in favor of writing perfectly memory safe software that nobody uses. Surely you have advice on that?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry about the friendly fire then, I guess. You seem to realize that in C++ you still have to think about lifetimes, only the compiler doesn't really hold your hand. I thought you were the ASSHOLE who dismissively declared that Rust programmers don't know how to write a linked list, without realizing that the problem is that C++ programmers usually don't know how to write C++ either. And that's why everything is on fire.

But you had to make more presumptions about my assumptions, and throw in a "nobody uses" because you genuinely have no idea how much my software is used, lol. So long as it keeps humming along you'll never have to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, I get it. You're God's gifts to computers. Carry on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're god damn right I am. But my patience for trying to bring people up to my level has more than worn thin because of arrogant thought terminators like I originally responded to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it costs nothing not to be toxic

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

do you think you're helping, posting a smug comment like that on a dead thread?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i forgot this is reddit where everything older than a day is soft deleted

if you genuinely think posting like this is constructive then it is my bad for assuming you were reachable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

you weren't trying to do anything but be a scold, and you should look in the mirror and grow up

you're only adding toxicity

please touch-grass