you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 335 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I remember when I had my clearance, we were told anything we worked on was classified for a minimum of like 75 years, unless it was declassified earlier. I remember because they told is if we were 18, we could potentially legally talk about our work at the age of 93, assuming the classification wasn't extended.

Anyway, part of that briefing was the outlining of consequences should we leak any classified information. We were told if the information we leaked resulted in the death of an intelligence officer anywhere in the world, we could and likely would be tried for treason. And the punishment for treason during a time of war (Global War on Terror, amiright) could be death.

So... He'll be charged with treason like any of us plebs would have been, right? Right?!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 104 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Wouldn't it be great if Trump had to follow the same laws as normal people. He's a complete traitor to the country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    At this point, I'd settle for even a subset of the same laws. It is somehow none of the laws.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    They were probably blustering about the treason thing.

    Because "treason" was specifically abused by Britain, the US Constitution puts specific requirements on the crime of treason. In particular, there have to be two independent eyewitnesses to the treasonous act. Meanwhile, the Espionage Act has no such prosecutorial burden, and the penalties are just as severe...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    It's been a while since I had it, so you may be right. Though, I do remember they were very specific it would only meet treason if it resulted in an intelligence officers death, but I don't remember under what Act or law they were interpreting from.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    they will probably make an exception for him because he’s a Very Good Businessman. just think about what he may have gotten in exchange for the list of spies. perhaps some compliments from putin, maybe even a pat on the back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments