92
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
92 points (98.9% liked)
British Columbia
1985 readers
9 users here now
!britishcolumbia@lemmy.ca
News, highlights and more relating to this great province!
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
If the landlord is allowed to continue renting to the new tenants, and the old displaced tenants are forced to rent for higher sums elsewhere, with the costs of moving, this really isn't very much justice at all. It's not nothing, and it's better than 0, but it's cold comfort. This should have been 160,000, which might give the next landlord pause before doing this. 16k is just written off as the cost of doing business, and recouped in the first year of higher rents, 160k would sting.
The best part is that most people can't absorb a $160k judgement, and the landlord would likely have to sell the home they were renting. The person who was evicted should be first in line to be able to buy the prior home.