this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
234 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59381 readers
3128 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The tech is useful.

To Microsoft, sure. But what about the users? Which problem or problems were being solved?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Biggest impact is accessibility. Think people with memory issues or blind. This tech will change their lives.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This isn't an unreasonable suggestion, but I'm not seeing accessibility mentioned anywhere on the Recall site. For those with sight issues, I'm unclear on how the process would be with the necessary screen-reader that MS is silent on compatibility with. Sure, text to voice is a thing, but that would only be useful at home unless you really want to have a computer read out loud everything it's got in Recall.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m talking more abstractly about the tech vs your concrete here today Microsoft Recall implementation of the tech. It’s unfortunate M$ isn’t working towards accessibility now, but this tech will enable such things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I appreciate the positive outlook for the possibility of things, but I live in a world where Microsoft has already violated customer trust and privacy, so I'll stick with what evidence supports. Evidence supports that this is not about customers, and is instead a new way for them to get additional data.

The risks of this being done incorrectly, at all, are much more worrisome than any speculative fiction I might want to entertain about them.