A federal rule banning fake online reviews is now in effect. 

The Federal Trade Commission issued the rulein August banning the sale or purchase of online reviews. The rule, which went into effect Monday, allows the agency to seek civil penalties against those who knowingly violate it.

“Fake reviews not only waste people’s time and money, but also pollute the marketplace and divert business away from honest competitors,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said about the rule in August. She added that the rule will “protect Americans from getting cheated, put businesses that unlawfully game the system on notice, and promote markets that are fair, honest, and competitive.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 2 years ago (10 children)

IMO, corporate punishments should work like that: steal a little from someone? Lose 90 days of profit. Steal a lot? Lose a couple years of profits. Kill someone? Lose 20 years of profits

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Jailing CEOs works better only because money is easy to manipulate. Loosing 20 years of profit just means bankruptcy. Make a new name new company buys all assets of bankrupt at fault company and nothing but the name changes. I'm with the idea that if companies have personhood than the person in charge is responsible for harm that personhood does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I wonder if having to face consequences for their actions would change how CEOs behave 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    No. That's not what that means. Profit by definition is the excess revenue that isn't required to run the business.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Cool, so just do stock buy backs to eat the profits while rewarding the executive suite

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    So again. Profit is the excess revenue (this time in bold and italicized) that isn't needed to run the business. Believe it or not stock buy backs aren't required to run a business. Weird huh?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    They tried that when McDonald's served coffee that gave an old woman 3rd degree burns on her genitals.

    A single days profits from coffee.

    McDonald's fought that in court, and spent many thousands of dollars on a PR campaign to vilify the woman they burned.

  • source
  • parent