this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
79 points (74.2% liked)

World News

38861 readers
2849 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meanwhile, incumbent Maia Sandu was closer to a second term in office, after partial results in the country's presidential election gave her a small lead over her main rival.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A) Guy is a gender neutral term.

B) normal humans do not examine the entirety of a users comment history. In this thread you two have agreed that Moldova and america have the same level of corruption in their respective democracies.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please do show evidence that 'guy' is a gender neutral term.

The dictionary seems to think it's gendered.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google it for people arguing about it in opinion pieces since before you were born. Hell I think this exact argument was on Seinfeld at one point. And there is no "the" dictionary, just as an aside. There is no single authoritative dictionary for any non constructed language, that's the opposite of how language functions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When exactly do you think I was born?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Well then do show this debated in, say, 1982.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

brb going to ask my cishet male friend to tell me about that guy he just married

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If someone addresses a diverse group as 'you guys' absolutely no real human being is confused or offended. If you are offended, step outside, get some sun, talk to a real human using your voice.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If someone asks a cishet guy how many guys they've been with do you think they're going to say 'oh I'm straight' and possibly get offended, or just start listing all the girls they've dated?

Like I work 6 days a week, I'm outside plenty. I get misgendered enough to know what's annoying to me.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If someone asks a cishet guy how many people they've been with, the cishet is going to correct to women they've been with, same with guys or any other gender neutral term that leaves the question ambiguous.

As far as your personal biases, I don't care. At all, even a little. If you feel gender neutral terms misgender you, that's on you. You actually are incompatible with the language you're using and need to change.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Me:

If someone asks a cishet guy how many guys they've been with

You:

If someone asks a cishet guy how many people they’ve been with

If you were calling me a person rather than a "guy" I would have no issue this whole time, notice how you just changed my wording to make your argument work?

I think I'll refrain from taking English language advice, or life advice from you

[–] [email protected] -2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I am calling you a person by calling you a guy, and I switched the word on purpose with another gender neutral term to emphasize the point, which you might have realized if you didn't have a complex about it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 21 hours ago

The point of what I was saying was that it's not as explicitly gender-neutral as something like "person". Thus the example of asking a cishet guy how that guy he married is doing, it just doesn't scan. It's not a huge distinction in most situations and is generally appropriate, but its also pretty clearly a passive aggressive dig when it's used in situations where it's the singular and the subject has made their gender clear.

You're welcome to dispute that it's not used as passive aggressive dig, but I'm just citing lived experience.