this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

World News

230 readers
329 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
5
Ukraine ‘will seek nuclear weapons’ if it cannot join Nato (www.telegraph.co.uk)
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Membership vital to ‘victory plan’, Volodymyr Zelensky tells EU summit, as he warns of need for powerful deterrent against Russia

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a bit nuanced and complicated. You're right in spirit of course.

Technically, those were the nuclear weapons of the Soviet Union. After it broke up, operational control of these weapons remained in Moscow as per https://nucleardiner.wordpress.com/2022/02/06/could-ukraine-have-retained-soviet-nuclear-weapons/

So Ukraine had physical possession, but they couldn't have turned them on from day 1 of independence. And if Ukraine had refused to return them, it seems it is an open question if they could have circumvented the security measures or not to gain control over them.

Ironically, my understanding from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00396338.2015.1026091 is that part of the reason Ukraine agreed to give up those nukes was in return for having not only security assurances, but to have those assurances extended to Crimea. This can be viewed and exchanging the nukes for retaining Crimea.

Considering what we know now... that might not have been the best deal. This almost has me asking, why not both? (Both NATO membership and nukes)