this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

earth

12812 readers
38 users here now

The world’s #1 planet!

A community for the discussion of the environment, climate change, ecology, sustainability, nature, and pictures of cute wild animals.

Socialism is the only path out of the global ecological crisis.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

The cyclical nature of his punishment reminded the authors of the circular copulatory tube of the spider.[2] There is a 2nd meaning in this naming, however; female Sisyphus' copulatory tubes evolved in this way due to a reproductive arms race between the male and female members of the species, the females growing longer and more winding tubes while the males grow longer and more winding corresponding appendages, an eternal task, akin to that of Sisyphus

you'd think evolutionary forces would drive development of sex parts to make sex easier not harder

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

It’s not unique to these spiders; a similar thing evolved with ducks. I think it’s a trade-off in species where the males tend to be, aggressive in their mating attempts. More complicated female sex organs makes it more difficult for the males to mate, which dissuades them, which means the females are spending less energy dealing with and recovering from the males mating attempts. Which then puts an evolutionary pressure on the males to develop longer/more complicated organs to match.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

crazy how male-female antagonism (dialectic) is moulded right into anatomy (material)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Only a hexbear could connect spider sex organs back to political theory. I'm honestly impressed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)