this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
166 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

58698 readers
3903 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“Passkeys,” the secure authentication mechanism built to replace passwords, are getting more portable and easier for organizations to implement thanks to new initiatives the FIDO Alliance announced on Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Literally just use a password manager and 2/MFA. It’s not a problem. We have a solution.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Actually, it is still a problem, because passwords are a shared secret between you and the server, which means the server has that secret in some sort of form. With passkeys, the server never has the secret.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The shared secret with my Vaultwarden server? Add mfa and someone needs to explain to me how passkeys do anything more than saving one single solitary click.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When a website gets hacked they only find public keys, which are useless without the private keys.

Private keys stored on a password manager are still more secure, as those services are (hopefully!) designed with security in mind from the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

If a website with old-school passwords gets hacked, the hacker only gets salted hashes of passwords - this does not seem to be much worse?

(Websites that store plaintext passwords surely won't implement passkeys either...)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Pass keys are for websites such as Google, Facebook, TikTok, etc. And then they go into what is currently your password manager or if you don't have one, it goes into your device. You still have to prove to that password manager that you are, who you say you are, either by a master password of some sort or biometrics.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Best password manager is offline password manager.

KeepassXC makes a file with the passwords that is encrypted, sharing this file with a server is more secure than letting the server manage your passwords

[–] [email protected] 12 points 21 hours ago

This is not at all relevant to the comment you're responding to. Your choice of password manager doesn't change that whatever system you're authenticating against still needs to have at least a hash of your password. That's what passkeys are improving on here

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree, and that's my method as well. Although I do not ever share the file with a server either. I only transfer it from device to device with flash drives or syncthing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

How do you handle merging between devices? Do you manually transfer/sync every time you add a new password?

Not trying to sell you on putting it in cloud storage or anything, but one really nice benefit to doing so is automatic merging through clients like Keepass2Android. If I add a new site to my phone and it doesn't already have the latest copy of my vault, it'll fetch and merge that first.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do that too, I have my own server in my basement for storage

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Look at us. A bunch of people who don't trust society. LOL.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can share passwords without the server seeing them. Many managers don't but there's nothing infeasible there. You just have a password to unlock the manager. Done.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What I'm getting at is that a web server has a password, in some form. And so if that site gets breached, your password itself may not get leaked, but the hash will. And if the hash is a common hash, then it can be easily cracked or guessed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

Not anything sufficiently modern. Salted passwords should be exceedingly difficult to reverse.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ultimately I'm pro passkey but when it comes to password managers: if the hash of your vault is easy to crack you've fucked up big time. There shouldn't be any way to crack that key with current tech before the sun explodes because you should be using a high entropy passphrase.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, you absolutely should. And if you are not, that is nobody's fault except your own.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never forget that technologically speaking you're nothing like the average user. Only 1 in 3 users use password managers. Most people just remember 1 password and use it everywhere (or some other similarly weak setup).

Not remembering passwords is a huge boon for most users, and passkeys are a very simple and secure way of handling it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I work for multiple organizations. The majority of which have a Google sheet with their passwords in that are

      c0mpanyname2018! 

Those that aren't are

       pandasar3cute123? 
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

At one point the organization I work for had a password that was literally Password-022!, guess what it was the following month?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

I had to start hashing passwords and sending it to the haveibeenpwned API.

I also fight with my users over data normalization because any time I add some rule (like don’t put “SO#” as part of the value of the “SO#” field), they’re too stupid to realize the point and find some other “hack” around it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I mean, it is. Aside from an additional associated cost, it's still much less convenient.