this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
252 points (96.7% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

650 readers
409 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

        (archived link)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Title is misleading. He mentioned federal law enforcement specifically because when he tried to use the military in 2020 they told him to fuck off. It is certainly possible to make a force out of cops that's a distinction without a difference to the people being taken but the distinction is very important because if the military does go for Trump then the course back to democracy becomes very bloody. A bunch of cops are much more like bullies, liable to stand down in the face of local ire.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It is certainly possible to make a force out of cops

You mean like Cop City?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

All true, except your claim that the title is misleading.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Federal forces reads as indicting the cops and military to me. That's why I think it's misleading.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You reading more into it than it says is misunderstanding, but not misleading.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, except why use the phrase federal forces instead of federal law enforcement? Unless you're trying to invoke images of both?