this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
208 points (94.4% liked)

World News

38553 readers
3539 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So killing and torturing civilians is ok in your book no matter what? Because that was what i have issue with in this matter.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How did you reach this conclusion? Did I say that? Don't put words in my mouth.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I said: "and that completely justifies any and all warcrimes against civilians?" and your response was: "That justifies war, yes. War sucks and people get killed. Now grow up."

So did you mean that warcrimes are inherently part of war and something that should just be accepted or what did you mean? Or did you mean it just shouldnt be discussed or be outraged about? Without further information there is very little to go on to get any other conclusions that are not in the line of what i asked.