this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
831 points (97.4% liked)

Memes

45608 readers
1115 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 154 points 1 year ago (39 children)

Thats actually a really good dilemma if you think about it. Like if everyone doubles it you basically don’t kill anyone. But you’ll always risk that there’s some psycho who likes killing and then you will have killed more. And if these choices continue endlessly you will eventually find someone like this. So killing immediately should be the right thing to do.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (16 children)

At some people you will run out of people to tie to the tracks.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (12 children)

How many branches is that going to take? Just out of interest.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

math checks out. log2(8 billion) ~= 32.9

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a little more complicated than that. You have to be summing everyone who is still tied to all the previous tracks. It needs to be a geometric sum formula.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could just move them over whenever someone decides to double it up. That way the person that was going to die alone is doomed to die anyway. 😂

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if we do stack it till every human is tied to the track whos at the lever?

Does the train/AI decide?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The current version of GPT is willing to sacrifice billions of robots for humanities sake. However, it proposed to strap alien civilizations to the track next. And in that case it would choose to save the larger group…

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It'll just be one fewer junctions. 2^n is always one more than the sum of 2^1+...2^(n-1)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think you have to include 2^0 for that to be true?

e.g 2^0 = 1, 2^1 = 2 2^0 + 2^1 = 1 + 2 = 3, 2^2 = 4 … 7, 8 15,16 31, 32 etc.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)