this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
-71 points (13.4% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3417 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nope. Bar is 100 miles from anywhere, no bus, no one else left with a car.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nobody puts a bar 100 miles from anywhere. People don't drive an hour and a half to go to bar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's an unrealistic hypothetical, like a third party candidate in the first place lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I bet there are more third-party candidates in America than bars that are 100 miles from anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Probably true. What's your point? The hypothetical situation is anything but realistic. It's a conversational vehicle to expose a forced choice dynamic, and to a lesser extent harm-reduction.

Do you think we're in the bar right now?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I love that you have to make up impossible scenarios to justify why you won't vote third party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
  1. I didn't make it up.
  2. Scenarios with obvious limitations and specific stories are used to highlight critical thinking concepts in simple ways for audiences who don't grasp the situation.

They aren't the only way to discuss a situation, but the above comment deemed a simplified hypothetical was conversationally useful.

I guess they were optimistic lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
  1. I didn't make it up.

But you're the one who suggested the bar was 100 miles away from anything.

And even then, you could still probably get an Uber. It would be pricey, but that's your fault for going to a bar 100 miles away from anything.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I specified it to try to help with your...troubles. No Uber.

Stop trying to dodge the scenario, that's how a kid tries to squirm out of rules about chores.

You either get it, and address it, or you don't.

Fiddling with how you don't accept the details is just making it clear you aren't ready to address the underlying concept.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm just gonna assume you're not old enough to drink since you don't know how bars work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Mmk. Assume all you like, bothers me not.

I don't need to assume anything about what you've put on display.