Humor

7452 readers

3 users here now

"Laugh-a-Palooza: Unleash Your Inner Chuckle!"

Rules

`Read Full Rules Here!`

Rule 1: Keep it light-hearted. This community is dedicated to humor and laughter, so let’s keep the tone light and positive.

Rule 2: Respectful Engagement. Keep it civil!

Rule 3: No spamming!

Rule 4: No explicit or NSFW content.

Rule 5: Stay on topic. Keep your posts relevant to humor-related topics.

Rule 6: Moderators Discretion. The moderators retain the right to remove any content, ban users/bots if deemed necessary.

`Please report any violation of rules!`

Warning: Strict compliance with all the rules is imperative. Failure to read and adhere to them will not be tolerated. Violations may result in immediate removal of your content and a permanent ban from the community.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

720

Ken M on love-making (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

111 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Against my better judgement I'm gonna try to respond to this.

You don't think there's an evolutionary advantage to getting at girls first when they're young as possible before other guys do?

To begin with, prepubescent girls can't get pregnant. After that, young girls have an increased risk of not being able to carry a pregnancy to term, dying in childbirth, and of birthing children who end up underdeveloped.

You don't think that advantage from that behavior got passed into genes?

No, then it would likely be more commonplace instead of being abnormal.

Youth generally comes with all the indicators of health.

I strongly disagree with this assessment when it comes to people who have not physically developed into adulthood yet.

Behavior is not generally without reason. Everything is because of reasons.

Sometimes those reasons are because something has gone wrong. Or because of random chance. To think every behavior fulfills an intended purpose that is evolutionarily beneficial is unscientific in my view.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Ok so I'm not taking about pedophilia I guess. It's the middle ground one where's it's post puberty because that's what makes sense. Gotta also consider the social aspect of it. Claiming a girl while she's still so young is likely to mean she's around when she can have a baby.

You're right that some behavior can be totally random because of an error and the error is reason, but it really seems like there's a LOT of pedophiles and rapists. I can only imagine there's a much more compelling reason.

Edit: I'm glad you're not one of the trolls.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I would blame more of it on social conditioning than on genetics. Our instincts and urges provide a baseline to steer us in the direction that historically has been beneficial to for survival, but those are not what ultimately what decide our actions, nor are they always even beneficial.

One example comes to mind is men not talking about their feelings, not only does it exacerbate mental health issues and cause a great deal of personal anguish and even death, it also increases the likelihood of interpersonal violence which is bad for society at large.

I think the reason why people react the way they do is not because they are trolls but rather because it very much comes off as you making excuses for pedophilia, which is already a very sensitive subject to talk about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"getting at girls" "as young as possible", even post-puberty is basically pedophilia, do you not agree?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Not by definition, no. People generally call anything under 18 pedophilia though, so I'm rolling with that language.