you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -44 points 2 years ago* (13 children)

Makes more profit to let them through than to refuse them at that point.

Also, let them through and they may get a membership for next time, refuse them and they are never coming back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Then what stops anyone from just never getting a membership?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I’m talking specifically about the self checkout loophole that only came when they made self checkouts….?

    Was that not obvious from responding to someone taking about that same thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The person you responded to does not mention self checkouts fyi

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    They are responding to a post specifically talking about self checkouts and the loophole that exists solely with them…

    How does this need to be explained? Lmfao.

    At the self checkout, the cost to return all the merchandise to the shelves costs money, to let them go through the the till is profit instead of a loss. This doesn’t exist in regular checkouts since you need to scan, at the self checkouts you don’t, so people try and abuse it.

    I was literally taking what the person I responded to a little further and this tripped you guys up? Fucking hell this place is weird to have conversations on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    It's literally not more profit for them, especially depending on what the person is buying. Costco is able to offer lower prices than a lot of other places specifically because the memberships help make up for what would otherwise be losses on margins

  • source
  • parent