this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
79 points (90.7% liked)

Gaming

2346 readers
218 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean, I feel like even the jump between 4 and 5 wasn't that massive. San Andreas to 4 went from chunky polygons to rather realistic graphics. GTA 5 feels almost like a HD remaster in comparison.

But of course, there may be a difference in expectation, since there were five years between 4 and 5, and currently scheduled to be twelve years between 5 and 6.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

4 and 5 were both designed for the same console, and that console was released in 2005 - only 2 years after Vice City.

6 is being designed for consoles 2 generations and 7 years separated from GTA 5's release. It better be better.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I can't be the only one who simply wants the physics and damage like they had in GTA IV. I feel like GTAV was a real big step down in terms of the driving. Just wasn't as satisfying to me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

5 feels worse in the ways that matter. The physics in 4 was so fun and dynamic, and in 5 they feel like they're aiming for realism.

To me, they removed the part of the game that makes it being open world fun.

I wasn't really expecting 6 to be anything but GTA5 with different characters.