you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 96 points 2 years ago (56 children)

It's finally over. Now get in someone who can beat Trump.

  • source
  • hideshow 56 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (50 children)
  • [–] 108 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Senator Mark Kelly, he can do this

    He flipped AZ to blue

    He is an astronaut, all American, former servicemen

    He can get red votes and blue alike

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    Hmm...not bad. Not amazing name recognition, but that could be remedied.

    Having Gabby campaign for/with him, especially after the DJT assassination attempt, could be beneficial, too. (Or could look like a disgusting political plot, but that's really all our politics.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago*

    Kelly or Mayor Pete seem like the best options.

    Buttigieg and AOC ticket? That would be the youth candidacy. Kelly and Buttigieg or vice versa would be more centrist but probably be the most robust candidacy.

    I hate to say it, but in this political climate and with the threat of Trump, the best shot is probably two young-ish white guys.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (30 children)

    yeah... i don't think harris is the answer....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    If Harris is in, she can use the money already donated. Otherwise they have to start from scratch.

    So it's almost guaranteed Harris will be in. Who they pick for VP is the question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I find this so insane. People talk about who gets to keep the money, who has which rich asshole routing for them, which strategy has been successfull in the past, like always setting up the current president for reelection...

    We need to focus on who has actually inspiring policies and ideas. We need to focus on these, because that is what the Reps lack. All they offer is "not the Dems" while the policies they propose are actually unpopular with many of their base. And the whole "Not Trump" strategy of Biden just fell apart.

    Is there noone in the Democratic party who can actually come up with a coherent vision of the future and inspire people to follow it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Is there no one in the Democratic party who can actually come up with a coherent vision of the future and inspire people to follow it?

    This is why I think Pete Buttigieg should throw his hat in if they do have a primary. He just had a Bill Maher interview that just went viral because he knows how to talk to the common people. I think his visions are inspiring, he’s done a lot of work for his department, and he isn’t afraid to walk across party lines and go on Republican shows to talk about the real problems. He’s smart enough to smash Trump in a debate, calling out all his lies, and even if Trump is too scared to debate him, he has no problem laying out Trump’s lies elsewhere coherently and cognitively.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

    No, they don't. The Democratic Party can give the donated money to whoever is the candidate. Not sure where people are getting that.

    Edit: After reading up, I am mistaken kind of. If Harris is still the VP candidate, the money could be used. Otherwise a PAC would have to be setup to funnel money to the candidate...maybe. Bloomberg was simply able to transfer his campaign funds directly to the DNC since it was part of his campaign money...even though the vast majority of it was his own money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The money Biden has raised directly however can only go to the people that were on his ticket at the time the donation was made

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's correct, but nearly none of the money is the direct donation stuff - it's almost in PACs which are (due to a legal fiction) entirely independent of the candidate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    There are still more restrictions however on spending on other candidates and they would have to act like any other PAC, only helping via donating/running ads in support of (but importantly not directly by) any other candidate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The $100 million warchest belongs to the Biden/Harris campaign, not the Democratic Party. They are separate organizations, and Biden/Harris only answers to Biden and Harris.

    The DNC has its own funds of course, but nowhere near as much. And DNC funds are supposed to be shared with multiple Democrats, not just the one running for president.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Half of America lost it's mind when Obama was elected, and we're still dealing with the fallout from that lovely dose of racism. There's no way Kamala could win in this country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    like all that aside, a lot of folks aren't appreciative of her background as a cop... but yeah that's a cherry to what you already mentioned

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Literally any straight white man center-right democrat born after 1968 would wipe the floor with trump.

    And before anyone jumps down my throat, that’s not what I want. I want president Cortez. But presidents are chosen by money and by about 10,000 generically stupid swing voters in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)