196

16442 readers

1528 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

248

Ameruleica 🦀 (i.ibb.co)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

187 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's fair. I think generally anarchists have good ideas. If there is a violent revolution, I would probably end up being your comrade in arms.

I don't think we would win though. Most people think anarchism is a bad word right now. I can't imagine recruiting fighters during the revolution under the banner of anarchism. Hell even progressivism isn't very popular. As always, liberals are the problem.

We may have to have a revolution but I think it needs way more time to cook.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'd participate in revolution because I'm not so ideologically entrenched that I'd refuse participation any anti-capitalist movement, but my ideal vision would be more aligned to what the Zapatistas have tried to do

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. I'm pretty ignorant about the Zapatistas. Looking over the Wikipedia and they seem all right.

I don't quite follow you. Do you mean like instead of winning the revolution. You take a chunk of the country create borders and install some kind of anarchy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I'm not sure "borders" is a term they'd use, but generally speaking yeah

Anarchism can start at the community level and often doesn't necessitate revolution