this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
73 points (98.7% liked)

World News

2301 readers
142 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That's true the trends go back further, but I think it was still possible to turn things around in the late 80s if more competent people were in charge. In my opinion, the most important aspect of USSR that needs to be analyzed going forward is how to improve the political system in order to keep opportunists and the incompetent out of positions of power. It's a general unsolved problem pretty much all human societies have that quality of leadership declines when the times are good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I doubt if it could be just entirely averted, but if we got Deng instead of Gorba... on the other hand, USSR and Warsaw Pact wasn't China, imperialists were way too invested into toppling and looting it, they would never left us just be there and rule ourselves on the promise of capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

For sure, USSR was put under far more stress than China. The other aspect was that, unlike China, USSR was seen as an ideological threat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A lot of it was the aging of the population and leadership, combined with loss of political knowledge caused by the loss of an entire generation during ww2.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Right, but the question remains of how to make sure things stay on track even under such conditions. Catastrophes like WW2 will happen sooner or later, and the ability to recover from such disasters is a critical aspect of ensuring the continuation of the system.