you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 58 points 2 years ago (18 children)

The idea is to have some experience in politics in lower positions before taking on the hot seat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I feel like mandating a certain number of years in some managerial governmental position would be more effective. Trump is basically a living example of how to get around that. Honestly a lot of democracy kinda assumes people elect competent and honest leaders and a lot of humanity are just brainwashed morons so we're stuck with what we got :/.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (8 children)
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It is 100% whataboutism. There is no denying it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's not whataboutism: https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/whataboutism-origin-meaning

    Whataboutism is about switching the topic and reversal of accusation.

    OP said that we have minimum age to be president, but according to SCOTUS it is a-ok to be a felon and running for the office.

    A whataboutism in the subject of this post, where we talking about impeachment of Thomas and Alito would be "what about Pelosi's stocks"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments