967
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

She was supposed to have the foresight to assume that the six months or so when they had a majority (when they passed ACA) was the last time Democrats would have the slightest hope of appointing a new supreme court justice.

What a fool she was! Not knowing the future!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The house does not vote on judges. Only the Senate. Obama had a friendly Senate until Jan 2015. They could even have done it during the lame duck session. But in reality the Senate was widely forecasted to change control so she could have retired in the spring without controversy.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

But they didn't have the supermajority necessary to overcome a filibuster anymore. Even the cloture rule enacted in 2013 excluded supreme court nominations.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

And that would have been gone in a hot second if they blocked RBG's replacement. They removed exactly what they needed to confirm judges.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
967 points (95.7% liked)

Just Post

955 readers
421 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS