you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

This only works because it's like $30. If this was a $60-70 game, I don't think it goes over well with the public. Nintendo is the only one that seems to get away with that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I think that's exactly the point though. "We didn't mark it up to mark it down, the price is just the price". As a chronic patient gamer part of me hates that (I love finding older classics for like $10) but I don't mind shelling out for a good game. The biggest expense is my time, and if a bunch of years later the price hasn't moved it's probably worth my time.

  • source
  • parent