this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
472 points (93.4% liked)

Old People Facebook

1442 readers
1 users here now

The sublemmy for "Old People Facebook" is a curated space showcasing the charming, confusing, and often hilarious social media endeavors of the older generation. From accidental memes and cryptic status updates to endearing attempts at using modern technology, this sublemmy celebrates the unique ways seniors engage with the digital world.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Ok I'll clarify my previous message. Vote for Dems.

Where would we be if Gore had won? 3rd party votes do not work. In fact they are counter productive.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's just so sad how broken the US voting system is. In Finland we have a population of ~5 million, and we have 9 parties currently in the parliament out of a total of 16 registered (the rest just didn't get enough votes to make it into parliament this time 'round).

Y'all have almost 350 million people and 2 parties, neither of which seems to have much interest in getting rid of first-past-the-post. The really sad part is that Thomas Jefferson independently came up with a voting method that's identical to the d'Hondt method that's pretty commonly used here in Urop and proposed that the US should use it, but if I remember right he was veto'd by Washington for whatever reason

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did we have President Gore? Unfortunately no.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

it wasn't decided by votes. it was decided by courts.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Again, did we have President Gore? No we did not. He stuck his head left and bam lost the election. Thanks 3rd party voters!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Courts wouldn't be involved if it hadn't been so close, so yes it was vote related

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

this can't be proven. courts may have become involved anyway, for some other reason. you can't prove a counterfactual.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

OK sure but thy point is the reason they were involved is the vote was so close, meaning that wasted votes did matter very much

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

the votes didn't decide that election.