this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
2602 points (99.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54539 readers
202 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

looks like rendering adblockers extensions obsolete with manifest-v3 was not enough so now they try to implement DRM into the browser giving the ability to any website to refuse traffic to you if you don't run a complaint browser ( cough...firefox )

here is an article in hacker news since i'm sure they can explain this to you better than i.

and also some github docs

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Remember when the web looked like this?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Found this in the source code, lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The free web will never escape trackers…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You're not wrong but i don't think this has anything to do with being free. If companies want to track you, they will (except for those whosr business model is privacy maybe). Regardless of how much you pay them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I read this with Samuel L. Jackson's voice and it sounds motherfucking cool

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

this is gold, thank you

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hot take: the internet was better when it was simpler like that.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Not hot take; correct take

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fast loading, accessible, secure, adjusts to any screen size. This might be the perfect site.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why did we stray from the path of good and mess with JavaScript?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Serious answer: because we wanted interactive sites (ajax it used to be called, iirc), like most online shopping.

Less serious answer: indeed, what do we even need javascript for when we have marquee and blink tags?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

JavaScript if done right can transform a website into something greater, like a game for instance. But excessive JavaScript on an article website can go to hell.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago