this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
84 points (74.7% liked)

politics

18909 readers
3557 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Right, but the argument is about the democratic party as a whole not the few individuals with no power within the party that are doing a good job.

Which is why the rest of my commentary addressed the party, its leadership structure, and its voters...

I don’t think it’s that complicated. With the two party system the main hurdle is just securing the support of the DNC. Once you’re established the choice is the incumbent or a conservative. So I think most elected officials may have represented their constituents level of progressive ideas at the time they were first elected. So in a party where we claim to be progressives, the elected officials are conserving the status quo of when they were first elected 30 years ago.

I think that's grossly oversimplifying things, to the point where I'm not even sure it's worth investing more effort in a response.

I get that, but I tend to believe American politics has the propensity to have the cart lead the horse. If the cart spent over a decade screaming at the horse that Democrats are the reasonable party, and reasonable people have to make concessions to conservative to make that progress, no matter how unreasonable those conservatives are…then of course a large portion of the constituents will still hold those beliefs in the long run.

I think the problem with arguing against a metaphor is that it's grounded in how you, specifically, see the problem. I simply can't argue against how you see things, nor do I intend to try.

Third way politics was not invented by the democratic constituents, stop the steal was not invented by conservative constituents. The unfortunate reality of America is that most of the people voting are being influenced by the leadership of political parties instead of the political parties being influenced by the constituency.

I give human beings way more credit than that, especially in aggregate. The exact same could be said about you being influenced by some kind of outside group, and I'm sure you'd argue that your beliefs are sincere and informed by evidence and experience. If you're taking the position that your beliefs are legitimate, but everyone else's beliefs are influenced by propaganda, then you and I are seeing the world very differently.

I'm not sure this is worth either of our time anymore. Best of luck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Which is why the rest of my commentary addressed the party, its leadership structure, and its voters...

Okay, so you are conceding the point about the democratic party making a "real"effort about wages then?

think that's grossly oversimplifying things, to the point where I'm not even sure it's worth investing more effort in a response.

Entrenched encumbrancey is a fairly simple well known issue in American voting.... I think your just just avoiding the argument.

think the problem with arguing against a metaphor is that it's grounded in how you, specifically, see the problem. I simply can't argue against how you see things, nor do I intend to try.

Lol, as opposed to what? Do you sincerely think that what you believe to be the problem is anything other than a belief? I'm just being honest and not trying to make it seem that my views represent the only realistic depiction of American politics.

give human beings way more credit than that, especially in aggregate. The exact same could be said about you being influenced by some kind of outside group

You think the American people collectively came up with the concept of third way politics? It's been a theory in politics since the 50's, was popularized in the 80-90s in Australia and in America by Bill Clinton.

I'm sure you'd argue that your beliefs are sincere and informed by evidence and experience. If you're taking the position that your beliefs are legitimate, but everyone else's beliefs are influenced by propaganda, then you and I are seeing the world very differently.

I'm not coming up with political theory.....of course my beliefs are influenced by others people's ideas, so are yours. The idea of political discourse is engaging in those ideas with others to better understand them.

not sure this is worth either of our time anymore. Best of luck.

Probably should have known better when you didn't even bother to read your own sources. Go kick rocks.