this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
84 points (74.7% liked)

politics

18909 readers
3584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They're asking the wrong question. The question should be who the economy is thriving for? The answer to that question will tell you everything you need to know.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

s/the economy/rich people's money/i

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

My wife and I are making more money than we ever have before. I got a raise and she got a new job that pays more than her old one. We're solidly on the high side of middle class. Sure, inflation pinched a bit of those gains, and it sucks that new and used cars are so ridiculously expensive, but both of ours are paid off so we'll just keep driving them. It's not all doom and gloom out there right now.

Edit: Downvoted for interrupting the doom loop. Never change, lemmings.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're reinforcing my point. The economy has improved for people who were already well off. The people on the low side are getting pinched even harder.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, I'm not. You have no idea what our finances looked like just a year ago, but it's clear you also don't care. You've decided you only want evidence that agrees with you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You've decided you only want evidence that agrees with you.

A single anecdote is not evidence.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The statistics of this very article are the evidence. It's right there in black and white!

A majority of Americans say that their own personal finances are doing well, and even when the question is expanded to their whole state, voters say the economy has improved.

You countered by dismissing it, so I met you where you wanted to be. But even that wasn't enough to dig you out of your preconceived belief. Carry on with your circle jerk.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Counter argument. I have also never made this much money. Neither has my boyfriend. We work at a hospital and make decent money. In Oct 2020 we were finally able to get our own apartment. We then moved back in with our old roommate last year. Because we were getting close to being homeless.

People were warning up about the disappearing middle class decades ago. I remember hearing about it in the 90s. And here we are. The wage gap between the top and the bottom has only widened.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How is that in any way a counter argument?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Person 1: Here's a thing about the economy

Person 2: My argument is that I am doing fine, so it is fine

Person 3: I would counter that by saying I am not doing fine, so by Person 2's logic, it is not doing fine, this proving it is not a good argument

Adult conversations aren't for everyone