this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
166 points (98.3% liked)

Atheism

4041 readers
36 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oops. Forgot the front cover.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (4 children)

They show how fossils contradict evolution

I've heard most creationist talking points before but this one is new.

How do they attempt to argue that the existence of fossils contradicts evolution by natural selection?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

How do they attempt to argue that the existence of fossils contradicts evolution by natural selection?

The usual claim is that because fossils don't show every single intermediary step that they can't possibly be showing evolutionary change.

Yes, that arguement is as stupid as it seems.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Yeah it's like arguing that a jigsaw puzzle isn't real, despite seeing it laid out before them completely assembled but missing 6 or 7 of the hundreds of puzzle pieces.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

19th century writers did us no favors when they started using 'missing link' to describe gaps in the human fossil record. Creationists ran wild with the idea that there is such a thing. Of course, now we have countless examples of transitional fossils and understand that evolution is not just jumping from one species to another species with well-defined separators between those two species, subverting the whole concept of a 'missing link.'

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Every missing link found creates two more missing links, between the new species and the ancestor and the new species and the descendant.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

A lot of dinosaurs I grew up learning about never even actually existed; they just came to be because archeology played fast and loose with the bones and was just making shit up.

I could see that being used against it also.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It wasn't that long ago that I learned that brontosaurus wasn't a thing. Also, I guess there's a new ocean and one less planet? 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have not read the book myself- someone elsewhere posted the images- but if the snail thing someone else posted is from the same book, and it appears to be, the answer is: terribly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Ah ok, so what they mean to say isn't so much that fossils contradict evolution but that the existence of fossils can be explained by the biblical account of Noah's Flood.

Not the same thing of course, but then hardly surprising given the apparent level of scientific understanding on display.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

They just do. Didn't you read the book?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Young Earth Creationists will go off on all sorts of tangents to explain it. Like how the fossils were put there by satan to spread doubt.

Even when I was a Christian, YEC’s were the idiots we made fun of. It’s an entirely unnecessary contrivance, all because they imagine that the humans who wrote everything were infallible.