this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
195 points (94.1% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2822 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I'm saying this is a strategy Hamas uses, and they haven't stopped. They have been launching rockets from Rafah, hospitals and other civilian areas, they told civilians not to evacuate from war zones, and since half of Gaza is children that means yes, Hamas is attacking Israel from among children.

I'm saying using such despicable tactics is not a free genocide without reprisal card, nor should it confer a tactical advantage as that just means more of this in the future.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes. You have already made it clear that you think the murder of thousands of children is justified for the sake of Israel's self-defense.

And I have made it clear that I think that if you have to kill thousands of children in the name of self-defense, you have nothing worth defending.

Suggesting that there is anything reason to justify killing thousands of children is pretty disturbing.

I would sacrifice my own life to save one child.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Collateral damage is not murder. I feel like a parrot having to refute all these same inaccurate characterizations over and over again. Calling it murder doesn't make it so.

Good thing you're not in charge of any defense forces. If your opponents strapped their own children to tanks I suppose you'd just let them roll in and take over.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It’s not a genocide because of collateral damage. It’s a genocide because they used wholly inappropriate 2000 lbs bombs on civilian targets, used starvation as a tactic, refused to let meaningful amounts of humanitarian aid in, bombed schools and hospitals, and used genocidal language that demonstrates intent.

Go ahead and defend Itamar Ben-Gvir if you want but he’s a Kahanist. Go ahead and defend Netanyahu but he’s the one who is a disgrace to Judaism and arguably the worst leader of a major power in my lifetime. War crimes have happened. Mass graves exist and torture prisons exist. Genocide requires intent and I’d argue there’s been dozens of statements by members of Israel’s cabinet that constitute a very strong case.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If your opponents strapped their own children to tanks I suppose you’d just let them roll in and take over.

You know, I was going to answer the rest substantively, but this is the most ludicrous thing I've heard in quite some time. You are not here in good faith.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I used a somewhat satirical metaphor you don't like, so now I'm not here in good faith? Interesting reasoning.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

"Somewhat satirical" does not describe the ludicrous thing you said. So yes, you're not here in good faith.