politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
In the short term, your position is justifiable. But in the long term, it's anti-democratic. The reasoning you've provided here has been used for many elections in the past and can be used forever into the future. But if we're forced to choose between two bad parties, and there's never a chance of a third party accomplishing anything good, then nobody will ever represent us.
And if we're stuck in a non-democracy forever, then it makes sense for people to pursue other more radical solutions. Is that what you want? It's the natural implication of your message.
Okay, whatever, while you're planning your grand revolution thing can you please for fucks sake vote for the option that kills fewer kids?
Your desire to support the two-party system above all else is what leads to alienation, on the right and on the left. It's you who is pushing the country towards a grand revolution, not me.
The two party system is, it doesn't need my support and your abstaining from participation will not harm it. The two party system will chug merrily along until Republicans end democracy.
Your comments are contradictory. First you say I should vote, and then you say it's pointless. Meh.
It's only pointless if you don't care who wins. Voting won't change the two party system, at least not directly and not any time soon. It will change who wins this November, and that's a very important thing.
Oh, I'm going to vote. But also my vote won't change anything. Not a swing state, never was, minority vote. Meh.
Not just President, there's plenty of downballot races too. Congress is arguably more important than the Presidency, generally.
Right, same story on my end, stuck in the minority there too, always have been...