The much maligned "Trusted Computing" idea requires that the party you are supposed to trust deserves to be trusted, and Google is DEFINITELY NOT worthy of being trusted, this is a naked power grab to destroy the open web for Google's ad profits no matter the consequences, this would put heavy surveillance in Google's hands, this would eliminate ad-blocking, this would break any and all accessibility features, this would obliterate any competing platform, this is very much opposed to what the web is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 3 years ago (2 children)

This is so silly. There is no technical solution to trust. What if Russia or China want to run a bit farm? Or the US goverbment? Are you not going to trust their signatures, and face legal action i their markets? This stuff is so stupid, just be honest that you want people to watch your ads. Than we can all refuse and move on with our lives.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    There is no technical solution to trust.

    Google knows this. Trust isn't really the problem they're trying to solve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    This is my biggest issue, it's such a bare-faced lie!

    It's completely insane for the browser to need to trust the client. Instead, you implement zero-trust, and require authentication and authorization for anything sensitive.

    The server absolutely shouldn't trust the client isn't malicious, instead it should assume it is malicious until proven otherwise

  • source
  • parent