this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
117 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15909 readers
17 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last Thursday, in the music humanities class I teach at Columbia University, two students were giving an in-class presentation on the composer John Cage. His most famous piece is “4’33”,” which directs us to listen in silence to surrounding noise for exactly that period of time.

I had to tell the students we could not listen to that piece that afternoon, because the surrounding noise would have been not birds or people walking by in the hallway, but infuriated chanting from protesters outside the building. Lately that noise has been almost continuous during the day and into the evening, including lusty chanting of “From the river to the sea.”

I did some easy googling and it's likely that John Cage would have wanted students to listen that way: “The powers-that-be have become more and more repellent,” he said in 1966. "Look at us in Vietnam. It is indefensible.”

Back to McWhorter:

I thought about what would have happened if protesters were instead chanting anti-Black slogans, or even something like “D.E.I. has got to die,” to the same “Sound Off” tune that “From the river to the sea” has been adapted to. They would have lasted roughly five minutes before masses of students shouted them down and drove them off the campus. Chants like that would have been condemned as a grave rupture of civilized exchange, heralded as threatening resegregation and branded as a form of violence. I’d wager that most of the student protesters against the Gaza War would view them that way, in fact. Why do so many people think that weekslong campus protests against not just the war in Gaza but Israel’s very existence are nevertheless permissible?

And what if John McWhorter were not a professor of linguistics, but actually a professor of cannibalism? That'd be pretty fucked up. What if, instead of writing books about language, he wrote books about how to cook and eat babies?

Favorite part:

The other night I watched a dad coming from the protest with his little girl, giving a good hard few final snaps on the drum he was carrying, nodding at her in crisp salute, percussing his perspective into her little mind. This is not peaceful.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Oh fuck off please, what a fucking whiny baby

McWhorter is another one of these people like Neil Degrasse Tyson, Steven Pinker and Sabine Hossenfelder, who are exceedingly knowledgeable in their fields but seem to think that that automatically makes them smart in other fields where they're not qualified to speak at all.

His podcast Lexicon Valley was one of the first podcasts I got hooked on years ago, and despite his weird obsession with obscure and annoying show tunes, it taught me so goddamn much about linguistics. His voice and cadence may be exactly what I think a bowtie would sound like if it could talk, but man could that guy make me rethink my conception of language.

I was disappointed when he handed the feed off to some other guys and just up and left, presumably to write "[controversial topic] is not what you think"-type essays for The Atlantic, or to be the conservative's favorite based lib talking head.

It's really fucking frustrating when a guy who shared so many insights that are still relevant to me as a language teacher decides to pivot and become a both-sideser turbo liberal who panders to whomever is willing to pay attention to and quote the smart linguistics professor man.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Sabine regularly shoves her entire foot in her mouth wrt physics by making huge, unjustified assertions and generally ignoring or completely misrepresenting any counter argument thrown her way. Anyone who was tangentially part of the physics community wasn't the least bit surprised by her YouTube absurdities.