Honestly how is that? This is always so vague. There was one high profile case that the organization was slow to respond
Are you referring to the Steven Powers case? Because the issues there go further than failing to respond, they straight up used disciplinary measures to protect an abuser. And the Steven powers case isn't the only one.
I will admit my bias on this issue though, I've had several encounters with PSL members where they've disrespected my bodily autonomy in mild-moderate ways to the point that I feel it is a pattern and am more inclined to believe specific reports of abuse.
Then we established a national-level body composed entirely of survivors to investigate and adjudicate these cases.
Can you give me any details on this?
Please elaborate.
From what I've heard they use the idea of democratic centralism to shut down debate during the democratic process instead of after a decision has been reached democratically.


