▲ 1308 ▼ Progress! (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world [M] to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 215 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I know it’s a shitpost, but the idea behind something like this is counter to the point of rehabilitation. Its counter to our understanding of entropy. Brains simply don't work like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Can you elaborate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071211233934.htm Even though participants remembered their own falls as having taken one-third longer than those of the other study participants, they were not able to see more events in time. Instead, the longer duration was a trick of their memory, not an actual slow-motion experience. Your memory is imperfect. But your actual capacity to perceive time is still limited by the facilities you use for that prescription. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) One experimental result does not define the entire domain of consciousness. You are essentially making a statement of the form “X does not and cannot exist”, which is always a logical fallacy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You are essentially making a statement of the form “X does not and cannot exist” Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. This is a Family Guy meme. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Can you elaborate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071211233934.htm Even though participants remembered their own falls as having taken one-third longer than those of the other study participants, they were not able to see more events in time. Instead, the longer duration was a trick of their memory, not an actual slow-motion experience. Your memory is imperfect. But your actual capacity to perceive time is still limited by the facilities you use for that prescription. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) One experimental result does not define the entire domain of consciousness. You are essentially making a statement of the form “X does not and cannot exist”, which is always a logical fallacy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You are essentially making a statement of the form “X does not and cannot exist” Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. This is a Family Guy meme. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071211233934.htm Even though participants remembered their own falls as having taken one-third longer than those of the other study participants, they were not able to see more events in time. Instead, the longer duration was a trick of their memory, not an actual slow-motion experience. Your memory is imperfect. But your actual capacity to perceive time is still limited by the facilities you use for that prescription. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) One experimental result does not define the entire domain of consciousness. You are essentially making a statement of the form “X does not and cannot exist”, which is always a logical fallacy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You are essentially making a statement of the form “X does not and cannot exist” Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. This is a Family Guy meme. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) One experimental result does not define the entire domain of consciousness. You are essentially making a statement of the form “X does not and cannot exist”, which is always a logical fallacy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You are essentially making a statement of the form “X does not and cannot exist” Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. This is a Family Guy meme. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You are essentially making a statement of the form “X does not and cannot exist” Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. This is a Family Guy meme. permalink fedilink source parent
