this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
140 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3916 readers
3 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Turns out Hansen should have been a household name in the '90s.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the first paragraph of your link:

Some press reports in the 1970s speculated about continued cooling; these did not accurately reflect the scientific literature of the time, which was generally more concerned with warming from an enhanced greenhouse effect.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I love it when people post citations that refute their main point.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

it really wasn't. I was around then. Nobody was talking about it like it was a thing that was going to happen. At best it might be talked about in relation to a movie or something as something that could possibly happen. Even then it was more like the sun going nova timeline wise.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

copy/paste from an email i sent my dad in 2016 :

Scientists did not suddenly reverse themselves and start talking about global warming in the 1980s. Greenhouse gas theory (CO2 specifically) has a 120 year history of scientific study starting with John Tyndall and Svante Arrhenius in the 1890s. Here is a link to the 1958 Bell Telephone Science Hour about (among other things) climate change all cued up to the relevant section. Hardly what I would call new. The prediction of a coming Ice Age when I was a kid may have been a hit in the popular press but barely shows up in the scientific literature. Most cooling predictions were related to aerosol pollution in the atmosphere which was cleaned up in the 80s and 90s. The best that could be said about the science in the 70s was that more research was required to make a prediction. And that is what happened in the intervening 35 years, lots of research.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That may yet happen, if geoengineering goes wrong.